Coastal area, seaport and airport

OCHA 8 March report reads that:

Following the elections in the occupied Palestinian territory, the Israeli government has stopped talks with the Palestinian Authority (PA) on the construction of a seaport in the Gaza Strip. Yet, the 15 November Agreement stated that the construction could commence.

The Israeli government has also cut off talks with the PA on the issue of operating an airport in Gaza following the elections.

Regarding fishing catch, OCHA reports that in Februray 2006, it was higher (58 tonnes) than the previous month but lower than the catch in February 2000, 2004 and 2005.

Since January 2005, the Israeli authorities have permitted Palestinian fishing up to 10 nautical miles from the Gaza Strip coastline compared to six nautical miles previously. Unde the Oslo Agreement, fishermen are entitled to fish 20 nautical miles from the coast. Palestinian fishing is prohibited one nautical mile north of the border with Egypt and one and a half nautical miles south of the border with Israel.

(See my March 17th posting for a similar yet a bit different account on 'permitted' fishing area)

Artistitic work on Gaza food shortage due to Karni crossing closure

by Palestinian artists Raaof Haj Yahia and Ali Batha.

Karni crossing opened but not fully operating

A press release by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) dated 22 March 2006 highlighting that:

• Karni crossing has re-opened but is not fully operating, therefore not letting sufficient food aid in
• There is a lack of fuel to distribute the food that comes in

As a reminder, here are some data which I had already typed down in my January 27th posting:

• More than 1.4 million Palestinians live in the Gaza Strip.
• 90% of the population are refugees.
• Some 65 to 75 per cent of Gazans are impoverished (compared to 30 per cent in 2000); many are hungry.
• About 42 per cent of Gazans are categorised by the World Food Programme (WFP) as 'food insecure'; in five areas of Gaza, the figure exceeds 50 per cent. An additional 30 per cent of the population is 'food vulnerable', i.e. under threat of becoming food insecure or malnourished.
• According to the World Bank, Palestinians are currently experiencing the worst economic depression in modern history, caused primarily by the long-standing Israeli restrictions that have dramatically reduced Gaza's levels of trade and virtually cut off its labour force from their jobs inside Israel.

Gaza Strip situation report 23 March 2006

The latest OCHA update on access to the Gaza Strip.

To follow up on access and closures to the Gaza Strip, OCHA website is a good place to go.

Commercial point of access between Gaza and Israel closed

Primary point for passage of goods between Gaza and Israel closed since February 12 despite the Access and Movement agreement brokered between Israel and the Palestinian Authority by the Quartet and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on 15 November 2005. See OCHA update dated 19 March.

Fishers facing tight squeeze

From the International Middle East media Centre (IMEMC). The media centre is a collaboration between Palestinian and International journalists to provide an English language media coverage of Israel-Palestine.

Wednesday 8 March 2006

"Fisherman have also faced a tight squeeze due to Israeli security forces controlling where and when they can fish, creating an arbitrary 'line in the sea', and enforcing it at will, firing at fishermen when they enter the sea to fish out of their small boats.

Director of the marine department in the agriculture Ministry, Mr. Tariq Saqer, said that fishing contributes 2% to the Palestinian national income, although it previously contributed much more.

Now, due to Israeli naval forces firing arbitrarily at fishermen, they are afraid to venture outside of a two-square mile area of coast, a tiny patch that is completely insufficient to provide the fish necessary to maintain their livelihood.

The United Nations and various human rights groups have condemned the Israeli closure and economic and military control of the Gaza Strip, saying that the current closure is causing a severe food crisis in Gaza."

The beginning of the IMEMC article speaks about the financial catastrophe of the Gush Katif greenhouses - transferred to the Palestinian Administration as a gift - due to Israeli closing of the Karni crossing between Israel and the Gaza Strip since February 12. This shows that at the moment fishing is still the only real industry in the Strip of Gaza. But most importantly the closing of the Karni crossing, the commercial crossing for Gaza, is likely to lead to a humanitarian crisis in the Strip: flour stocks are finished as well as other basic food commodities.

How Palestinians feel about election results: a public opinion poll

What would bring a people, the most secular of Arab populations with little history of religious fundamentalism, to vote Hamas?

The Jerusalem Media & Communication Centre (JMCC) has conducted a public opinion poll on Palestinian attitudes towards the results of the elections held on January 25, 2006.

1,200 people were surveyed throughout the West Bank (760 people) and the Strip of Gaza (440 people). Respondents surveyed from the Strip of Gaza came from in and around Gaza, Khan Younis, Rafah and deir al Balah. The average age of the respondents was 34 years and respondents included fishermen.

As a reminder, in the New Parliament, Hamas won 30 seats from national lists and 46 seats from election districts, i.e. 76 seats out of 132.

I've written below some of the results obtained from the poll in the Gaza Strip to get a feel of how Gazans approached the elections.

Number of respondents in the Gaza Strip= 440

Did the elections results meet your expections?

Met my expectations: 26.1
Somewhat met my expectations: 31.8
Did not meet my expectations: 40.9
No answer: 1.2

Given the elections results, to what extent you say that the elected members represent your point of view?

Represent my point of view: 32.7
Represent my point of view to a certain extent: 40.2
Do not represent my point of view: 24.8
No answer: 2.3

In general, how do you evaluate the performance of the previous Palestinian Legislative Council?

Very good: 3.2
Good: 20.7
Bad: 39.8
Very bad: 34.5
No answer: 1.8

What is the government structure you hope to see after the Palestinian Legislative Council elections?

National Coalition: 55.5
Hamas Government: 23.4
Technocrat Government: 16.1
No answer: 5.0

The Palestinian Authority is committed to the option of political negotiations with Israel. Do you believe that the new government headed by Hamas has to continue with the political negotiations, stop the political negotiations and should adopt other options?

To continue with the political negotiations: 63.2
Stop the political negotiations: 33.9
No answer: 2.9

If you voted for Hamas , why so?*This question was asked who said that they voted for Hamas

Religious Factors: 18.9
Hope to end the Corruption: 47.6
Hope to live in better living conditions: 7.9
For their political agenda: 11.0
To stop Fateh's control over the government: 5.3
Others: 3.5
No answer: 5.8

Regardless of whom you voted for, why do you think most People voted for them?

Religious Factors: 11.6
Hope to end the Corruption: 51.4
Hope to live in a better living conditions: 18.4
For their political agenda: 5.5
To stop Fateh's control over the government: 9.8
Others: 2.3
No answer: 1.0

International assistance

(Personal research work)

There are two main agencies which have provided assistance to the fisheries sector in the Strip of Gaza. These are the Danish International Development Agency, DANIDA, and CARE International, an international non governmental relief and development organisation.

DANIDA Gaza fisheries sector

DANIDA has provided support to the Gaza fisheries sector since 1996 via the Gaza fisheries project. The Gaza fisheries project lasted four years with a budget of DKK 19 million. It was followed by a consolidation phase, which started in 2000 and had a DKK 6 million budget. The consolidation phase which was meant to last 18 months was delayed due to the political situation. The consolidation phase is now closing with the construction of the Hauling Launching System slip way.

The objective of the DANIDA Gaza fisheries sector was to support the development of the fisheries sector in Gaza through the training and capacity enhancement of the Directorate of Fisheries with a focus on fisheries management, fisheries research and data collection, and general management and administration. Major activities of the project included: Assisting the Directorate of Fisheries in promoting cooperation with the Fishermen’s Association and Cooperative; Assisting Directorate of Fisheries staff in developing biological sampling and data collection; Facilitating the construction of a Hauling Launching System in the port of Gaza; Assisting Directorate of Fisheries in developing management skills, etc. Due to difficult situation, halted activities and closures, activities relating to data collection and inspection severely suffered during the project implementation and consolidation phase.

Following the outbreak of the Intifada (2000) which resulted in high poverty rates amongst fishermen’s households, DANIDA also started a fisherwomen’s Association project. The project was completed in 2004.

CARE International Gaza Fisheries Conservation and Development Project

CARE International implemented in collaboration with the American Near East Refugee Aid organization the Gaza Fisheries Conservation and Development Project during the period 1997 - 1999. The main components of the project funded by IFAD were:

• Strengthening the managerial capacity of the Fisherman’s Cooperative;
• Establishment of a savings fund for fisherman in Gaza;
• Provision of training to fisherman, cooperative staff and Ministry of Agriculture Staff in ways and means of conserving and developing the fishing sector in Gaza;
• Establishing women’s solidarity groups and assisting them to develop community-managed savings and loan facilities.
  

The project also included a sector review of fisheries in Gaza and a number of concept papers for the undertaking additional initiatives, including for the development of an artificial reef in Gaza to increase the productivity of fisheries.

International Management Group

The European Commission International Management Group has recently assessed the feasibility of rehabilitating the fishery shelter in Gaza (to make it a port) and the social impact the rehabilitation of the shelter would have on fishers. What is causing problem with the current shelter in Gaza is: i) its design - in its current state, the shelter is creating environmental problems with 650, 000 tonnes of sand coming in each year - and ii) fish catches decrease due to Israeli fishing restrictions (permitted fishing area: 10 nautical mile from coastline). Regarding catch decrease, Seamus Dunne from the International Management Group, recommends developing artificial reefs and mariculture. The report has been submitted to the European Commission for funding and to the Palestinian Authority for agreement.

Future assistance? This is currently THE question. What will be the relationship between the new leadership and the international community? Will the international donor community cut off aid?

Trade and Movement

(Personal research work)

Without trade the Gazan fisheries sector cannot develop.

The main commercial point for products in and out of Gaza is Karni (Almentar in Arabic) checkpoint. Export figures show that for one ‘Palestinian’ container out, four ‘Israeli’ containers come in – indicating a net transfer in favour of Israelis. Two months after the completion of unilateral Israeli disengagement from the Gaza Strip, an agreement was reached on 15 November 2005 between the Government of Israel and the Palestinian Authority. The Agreement set an export target of 150 truckloads a day by the end of 2005. OCHA reports that in December 2005, 48 truckloads of goods left from Gaza, a figure well below the export target set in the 15 November Agreement.

Major hindrances to fish exports are:

• the stringent checks truckloads have to go through at the Karni check point to meet Israeli security concerns which make it difficult to export fresh fish, a very perishable good;
• the back to back loading system, by which goods are unloaded from one truck and reloaded onto another truck at the checkpoint;
• the lack of market outside Israel. No fish marketing is allowed from Gaza to the West Bank and the Jordan markets – where there is a high demand for fish;

and also,

• the unavailability of fish inspectors at the check point outside regular office hours;
• the lack of equipment and modern storage facilities for importing and exporting fish.

Another impediment is that Israeli imports into Gaza have precedence over Palestinian exports out of Gaza. OCHA reports that 22 of the 31 import and export channels at Karni are either exclusively for Israeli imports or with Israeli priority where dual passage occurs. This is in breach of the Paris protocol agreement that affirms the equality of treatment for Palestinian and Israeli goods. Presently Israel exports 1,300 tonnes of frozen fish and 900 tonnes of fresh fish into Gaza a year – mostly species not consumed in Israeli markets due to local dietary practices. It is estimated that an additional 800 tonnes of high value fish not accounted for in Palestinian statistics are sold a year to Israeli merchants waiting at some 10-15 kms off the coast of Gaza with the blessing of the IDF (Israeli Defence Force).

Trading fish by air is not an option, as air traffic out of Gaza is prohibited. By sea? Access to Gaza by sea is denied. As for the sea port in the Gaza Strip, its future is still uncertain. The 15 November Agreement stated that the construction of a seaport can commence but is not expected to be operational within two years. The importance of a port at Gaza to the Palestinian economy was agreed on by both sides at Oslo, as being necessary for the development of free foreign trade with other countries in the world. The work which began in August 2000, with European donors’ funds, was stopped after the outbreak of the Al Aqsa Intifada in October of that year because of the political and military situation. Now the sea port, better described as a shelter, needs rehabilitation. It is silting over with 650,000 tonnes of sand coming in each year. Seamus Dunne, Senior Social Development Officer for the International Management Group, a body working with the European Commission (DG Development) says a rehabilitated sea port would offer: better security (at the moment there are a lot of accidents walking to boats); better equipment and modern storage facilities for importing and exporting fish (provided that Israeli restrictions on trade are lifted), and; an additional 9 kms to fish. (to be continued)

Election poll day in Gaza

An article on election poll day in the Gaza Strip highlighting: the party-like atmosphere at the polling stations, the voices of the people against occupation and corruption and the popular support for Hamas - born in Gaza. According to the author of the article, Eóin Murray: "Certainly anyone who has ever been to the Gaza Strip and witnessed Israeli human rights violations and the chaos on the streets because of the collapse of law and order is not shocked at a good showing by Hamas".

'Occupation' and 'collapse of law and order' reminded me to put the following figures:

• More than 1.4 million Palestinians live in the Gaza Strip.
• 90% of the population are refugees.
• Gaza has the highest birth-rate in the region – 5.5 to 6.0 children per woman.
• Eighty per cent of the population is under 50; 50 per cent is 15 years old or younger.
• Access to healthcare and education is rapidly declining.
• The half of the territory in which the population is concentrated has one of the highest densities in the world.
• Levels of unemployment are of 35 to 40 per cent.
• Some 65 to 75 per cent of Gazans are impoverished (compared to 30 per cent in 2000); many are hungry.
• About 42 per cent of Gazans are categorised by the World Food Programme (WFP) as 'food insecure'; in five areas of Gaza, the figure exceeds 50 per cent. An additional 30 per cent of the population is 'food vulnerable', i.e. under threat of becoming food insecure or malnourished.
• According to the World Bank, Palestinians are currently experiencing the worst economic depression in modern history, caused primarily by the long-standing Israeli restrictions that have dramatically reduced Gaza's levels of trade and virtually cut off its labour force from their jobs inside Israel.

The question is now: What comes next? What will be the relationship between the new leadership and the international community? Will violence excalate? Will the international donor community cut off aid? What will happen to Gaza?

Palestinian Fishing after the Disengagement

(Personal research work)

Prior to the disengagement, internal movement was almost impossible within the Gaza Strip. Fishers and farmers from Al Mawasi, a 14 kilometre long and one kilometre wide enclave caught between the Gush Katif settlement block and the sea had little access to the outside world, for example. Fishing was prohibited from the nearby wharf of Khan Younis and subject to restrictions from the other wharf, the Rafah wharf. People could only access Al Mawasi through a single internal checkpoint through which it was virtually impossible for non residents to enter- be they family, friends or merchants. Only one fisher a year was allowed into Gaza City to register all the other fishers. These registrations were important for fishers as they made them eligible for international assistance, in particular World Food Programme food aid, on which the restrictions on sea and land made them heavily dependent (see also Safety Net for Palestinian Fishermen).

It was clear from the Disengagement Plan that Israel would maintain marine authority off the coast of Gaza. Less clear were the restrictions, if any, Israel will impose on the activities of the fishers and whether Israel will continue marine inspection off the coast of Gaza.

Months after the disengagement, completed on 12th September 2005, internal movement has seen a dramatic improvement within the Strip. Yet, the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights reports that: since fishers have been allowed back into the sea they have been subjected to intensive monitoring by the Israeli military at sea, including shooting (see also Some relief for Gaza’s fishermen).

The lastest OCHA Humanitarian Update for November December 2005 reports that:

• Access for Palestinian fishing has improved in Al Mawasi;
• Due to the prohibition of use of Khan Younis wharf and the restrictions at the Rafah wharf as well as Palestinian looting in the aftermath of the pull out, the wharves are in need of repair (USD 675,000 and USD 460,000 respectively);
• There is growing concern in Al Mawasi about the ability to export agricultural products through Karni crossing.
  

As for access to fishing, the OCHA update reads that:

• Palestinian fishing remain restricted by Israeli measures up to 10 nautical miles from the coastline;
• Palestinian fishing is further prohibited one nautical mile north of the border with Egypt and one and a half nautical miles south of the border with Israel;
• Palestinian fishing was totally prohibited between 24 September and 6 October (see also Some relief for Gaza’s fishermen).

OCHA stands for Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs - It is a United Nations agency whose mandate is inter alia to coordinate humanitarian response. On the OCHA Humanitarian Update Nov Dec 2005 link, you will find a map of access for Palestinian fishing dated November 2005 (p7) as well as maps of Gaza prior and post disengagement - practical to see where the Gush Katif settlement was. (personal research work posting to be continued)

Israel's sea access restrictions threaten the sustainability of fish stocks off the coast of the Gaza Strip

(Personal research work)

Israel's restrictions on sea access have led to the over-fishing of accessible stocks off the coast of Gaza. Under the Oslo Accords, Gaza Strip fishers are entitled to fish 20 nautical miles off the zone L coastline of the Gaza Strip, that is the central maritime zone of Gaza. In 2000, after the second Intifada, fishing in zone L was restricted to 6 nautical miles, resulting in a further reduction of the fishing zone for approximately the same number of boats (trawlers, purse seines and small boats). The consequences of this excessive fishing effort are: the degradation of fishery resources, the dissipation of food production potential and economic waste.

Fishers have been reported to use smaller mesh size nets resulting in the catching of young/undersized fish which will not reach maturity and thus will not replenish the seacoast and are not even be marketable. Half a tonne of fish a day is dumped because fish are too small or non marketable. Also, it seems that Palestinian fishers have started fishing breeding grounds. In the face of this, the Fisheries Directorate in Gaza is hand tied, as it does not have the capacity to implement regulations. Further fisheries management practices are few (but do exist, e.g. closing fishing season, withdrawal of small fish specimen on the fish market) and regulations are inadequate.

In 2003, the annual catch was 1,083 metric tons, mostly sardines, followed by mackerel, swimming crab, cuttlefish, horse mackerel, prawns and little tunny (sources: Palestinian National Authority Ministry of Agriculture). This represents a considerable decrease compared to 2002 when annual catch was 2,379 metric tons (sources: Food and Agriculture Organization, Fishstats). Seamus Dunne, Senior Social Development Officer for the International Management Group, a body working with the European Commission (DG Development) says that estimates taken from 5 years pre Intifada and 5 years post Intifada show that fish catches decrease 2,38 tonnes/day along the coast of Gaza Strip. At this rate, the fishing industry in Gaza has little left to live.

In the meantime, foreign flagged boats are said to be operating off the coast of Gaza reducing even further the social and economic opportunities the sea offers to Palestinians.

Has the disengagement from Gaza changed anything? To be continued

The 1993 Oslo Accords leading up to the Overfishing of Accessible Fishing Stocks off the Coast of Gaza

(Personal research work)

The Gaza Strip came under the autonomous rule of the Palestinian National Authority in 1994, as a result of the Oslo Peace Accords of 1993. The same accords divided the approximately 41km long coastline of the Strip into three zones. The two zones at the ends of the Gaza Strip were defined as buffer zones and closed to Palestinian boats. The reason put forward was Israeli security and stopping boats getting to Egypt, to the area opposite the Israeli settlements of Gush Katif and to Israel itself. The consequences for the fishing communities in the southern parts of the Strip - where most fishing communities are located after Gaza City (approx. 1,100) - were devastating. They lost their immediate source of cash and food, and in some cases lost their source of living, as boats and nets were left unused deteriorating on the beach. Only the central zone of the Gaza Strip was open to Palestinians for fishing but only up to 20 sea miles out from the coast - which means that deep water fishing was prohibited.

After the al Aqsa Intifada, in 2000, all Palestinian vessels were forbidden to go further than six nautical miles out, further reducing the capacity of Palestinians to live off the sea.

Sometimes complete bans are imposed on fishers. It is estimated that in the five year period following the al Aqsa Intifada, fishers have been denied access to the sea for an accumulated total of one year. Recently, from September, 24^th until October, 8^th, 2005, the Israeli Defense Forces did not allow Gaza's fishers access to the sea. This complete closure occurred during the Sardine season and also at a time when the moon provides optimal light for fishing. Fishing being a seasonal activity, these bans are devastating. Vessels which do not obey restrictions are shot by the Israeli navy, with the consequences this entails in terms of loss of life and equipment. A Washington Times interview of Tarik Mousbah Saker, Fisheries Director in Gaza, reads that in 2004 an estimated $10 million in equipment was destroyed by Israeli naval forces in addition to millions more in lost income from fish sales. To be continued.

Fishing aside, there is no real industry in Gaza

(Personal research work)

Fishing has a long tradition in Palestine with fishers operating from Haifa (now Israel) to Port Saïd (Egypt). In 1948, following the tragedy of Palestine, the Nakba, many Palestinian communities were forced to flee the coastal areas between Haifa and Jaffa and took refuge southwards in the Gaza Strip. The displaced Palestinians who lived off fishing continued to do so, joining the fishing population of the Strip. Nowadays, there are 2,500 fishers in the Strip of Gaza and a further 2,500 people employed in the fishing industry (e.g. fish marketing, boat services, boat repair and maintenance). Out of the 1,4 million Palestinians living in the Strip, it is estimated that approximately 35,000 people rely on the fishing industry as a source of income or food.

The fisheries sector is relatively small compared to the major fisheries of neighbouring countries. But for the economy of Gaza, which has a high unemployment rate and suffers severe shortage of job opportunities, the fisheries sector is a significant source of employment and is an important source of high protein food. Fishing aside, there is no other real industry in Gaza. The hothouses, transferred as a gift to the Palestinian Administration, still have to prove their economic viability. There is doubt whether the export of their produce abroad by the Palestinians will succeed, as they do not enjoy the special privileges settlers had in terms of water use and border crossings.

Fishing activities along the Gaza Strip are carried out in four main fishing sites: Gaza City, where most fishers are, Deir El Balah, Khan Yunis and Rafah which altogether count around 1,100 fishers. Since 1967, the year Israel occupied the Strip, fishing activities became severely controlled and restricted. to be continued. (Email me for bibliographical references)

Safety Net for Palestinian Fishermen

A baseline survey by the United Nations World Food Programme (WFP), dated September November 2004, noted that fishermen (65 percent) are highly dependent on fishing as their main source of income. 25 percent rely on external aid and charity as their main source of income. External aid and charity constitute the majority of their secondary and tertiary source of income (representing 86 percent and 77 percent respectively).

The WFP press release attached here (click on title) was published on August, 3 2004. It refers amongst other things to the WFP provision of food aid to fishermen; a safety net to help them cope with the crisis. “This is a category of people who have lost everything and are very food insecure".

Disengagement’ Affords Some Relief for Gaza Fishing Enclave

"When the settlers were here, I was prevented from fishing (...) The situation is a lot better but we are still forbidden from using boats, so the fishing is tough".

Written approximately a month after Israel's disengagement from Gaza, Jon Elmer's article published in The New Standard on 14th October 2005 points to: i) the restrictions on the freedom of goods (and movement) between the Gaza Strip and Israel, through the back to back transportation system (by which goods are unloaded from one truck at the checkpoint and reloaded onto another truck on the other side), resulting in spoiled produce (fresh fish cannot wait at chekpoints!) or inflated prices for merchandise; ii) the lack of free passage of goods from the Strip of Gaza to the outside world, that is the lack of export markets on which fishers are dependent for their survival, and; iii) the continuous restrictions on Palestinian boats in the sea off Al Mawasi (the Gaza Fishing Enclave the article focuses on). Unless these restrictions are overhauled, the disengagement will have little effect on Gazan fishermen' livelihood and the local economy.

The Gaza Pullout: Caught in a Trap

"We are in a prison now but we may end up just being in a bigger prison" - Donald Macintyre's article, published in the Independent on August 11, 2005, describes the life of fishermen in Al Mawasi, a strip of land wedged between the sea and former Jewish settlements in southern Gaza. Written a week before Israel's disengagement from Gaza, the article raises interesting questions so as to the future of fishermen, not only in terms of rehabilitation of infrastrutures/boats/nets/etc. but also in terms of possibilities to market their catch - if any.

Some relief for Gaza’s fishermen

Despite its promising title, this article by the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights is in fact an example of the restrictions and closures imposed on Palestinian fishermen. The article refers in particular to the two week fishing ban imposed on Palestinian fishermen during the disengagement from Gaza. The ban occurred during the Sardine season. Fishing being seasonal, this means a considerable loss of income and food for the 35,000 people in Gaza who rely on the fishing industry. To read more, click on Some relief for Gaza’s Fishermen in links.

Why this blog?

Rear windowz is a personal blog. It is the fruit of more than three years spent working on fisheries related issues and of four months spent in Palestine (May 2005; July-Sept 2005), working and collecting information on fisheries in the Gaza Strip. It aims to provide general and more focused information on this vital sector for Gaza, for both fisheries and non fisheries experts. The ultimate goal is to draw attention to the sector and stimulate ideas on rehabilitation projects.

Gaza Strip Photos

To picture the Gaza Strip, take a look at Steve Sabella's photos clicking on the Gaza Strip Photo link.